Justice Minister Dismisses Claims That Maximum Libel Damages Will Rise

In brief

  • Justice Minister Clifton Grima has refuted suggestions that the government intends to raise maximum libel compensation.
  • Reports had circulated alleging that statutory libel damages could jump from around €11,000 to €30,000.
  • Media reporting highlighted previous electoral manifesto pledges alongside Grima's statements outside Parliament.

Justice Minister Clifton Grima has firmly rejected claims that the government intends to raise the maximum financial damages awarded in libel lawsuits. Speaking to reporters outside Parliament on Wednesday, Grima dismissed reports suggesting that statutory caps on libel penalties would experience a substantial increase.

The minister's remarks followed speculation that authorities planned to raise the ceiling for libel awards from the current threshold of approximately €11,000 up to €30,000. Grima stated unequivocally that no such policy shift is being planned by the administration.

Under current Maltese civil law, maximum damages in defamation cases remain capped at around €11,000, a limit established following reforms that repealed criminal libel provisions. The prospect of higher penalties had prompted concern among media professionals regarding the potential chilling effect on public-interest journalism.

The issue of media legislation remains a subject of ongoing scrutiny in Malta, particularly regarding commitments made in the Labour Party's electoral manifesto. That manifesto included proposals concerning libel laws and provisions relating to privacy protections in relation to journalism.

During the doorstep exchange outside Parliament, questions were also raised regarding the administration's broader approach to media legislation, including matters concerning privacy rights and protections against criminal sanctions for reporters.

Grima maintained that the government has no intention of raising libel damages, seeking to quell recent speculation as discussions surrounding statutory safeguards and media reform continue across the political sphere.

The Spin Room

Medium media divide. While Newsbook focused directly on the minister's rejection of proposed increases to libel fines, The Maltese Herald drew attention to manifesto commitments and questioned the minister's answers on criminal libel.

  • Newsbook: Focused on Clifton Grima's explicit denial that libel damages would rise from €11,000 to €30,000.
  • The Maltese Herald: Emphasised the Labour Party's manifesto pledge regarding libel damages and highlighted the minister's responses on criminal libel and privacy.

Sources (2)