Activists Demand Demolition of Bidnija Facility Following Final Court Ruling
In brief
- Environmental activists have called on the Planning Authority to demolish an illegal structure in Bidnija.
- The demand follows a definitive court decision confirming that permits for the facility were unlawful.
- Campaigners insist the controversial development, approved under the guise of a sheep farm, must be cleared.
Environmental organisations and activists have called on the Planning Authority to tear down a controversial development in Bidnija, following a final court judgment confirming the illegality of the premises.
The complex, widely referred to as a fake sheep farm, was originally approved under planning rules intended for genuine agricultural operations. The site sparked widespread public concern due to its considerable scale and intrusive presence within an ecologically sensitive valley.
Activists had long contended that the development was never intended for legitimate farming purposes, alleging that agricultural planning policies were exploited to construct a commercial or residential estate in an outside development zone.
The final ruling by the court has now brought an end to prolonged legal procedures concerning the facility. Judges definitively confirmed that the original planning permits granted for the structure were contrary to planning regulations and therefore invalid.
Following this decisive judicial outcome, environmental campaigners stressed that the Planning Authority must carry out its legal duty without further delay. They pointed out that allowing an unlawful structure of such magnitude to remain standing would undermine public trust in the planning framework.
The activists have urged enforcement officers to initiate direct action to dismantle the premises and restore the rural landscape to its natural state, arguing that only complete demolition will send an unequivocal signal against illegal rural development.
The Spin Room
Low media divide. Both outlets reported the activists' demands and the court ruling consistently without divergence.